Maintaining Local Control


By Governor Pete Ricketts

Nebraska has 529 cities and villages, 245 K-12 school districts, 93 counties, 23 natural resource districts, 17 educational service units, and six community colleges.  These are just some of the hundreds of local governments responsible for levying property taxes in Nebraska.  Property tax revenues fund local government, not state government.  The state, however, is responsible for setting the rules for how property taxes are levied.  This means the state can put measures in place to encourage local governments to control spending over the long term.  When taxpayers are demanding structural property tax relief, it is incumbent upon us as state leaders to take action.

 

 

Slowing the growth of local government spending is the focus of the property tax relief plan I proposed with Senator Kate Sullivan, Chairwoman of the Education Committee, and Senator Mike Gloor, Chairman of the Revenue Committee.  Last week, I detailed LB958 in the Revenue Committee, a bill aimed at encouraging fiscal restraint and accountability by political subdivisions like cities, counties, and natural resource districts.

 

This week I want to focus on LB959 in the Education Committee.  Like the companion bill in the Revenue Committee, LB959 sets benchmarks for measured growth in spending for school districts, community colleges, and educational service units.  This is accomplished through four major reforms.

 

First, a change in the budgeting process to simplify school district budget growth to 2.5 percent plus expected student growth.  It also moves predictable annual retirement expenses into the budget base.  Right now, schools are able to grow their budgets above this limit without taxpayer approval.  In the event of sudden or unforeseen circumstances, schools can still increase their budget with a vote of the people.

 

Second, LB959 limits the percentage schools can put into their reserves annually and limits the unused budget authority a district may carry forward.  To maintain flexibility, school districts are still allowed to put money away for rainy days and to carry forward a limited amount of budget authority.

 

Third, it makes a revision to a provision in the state school funding formula called needs stabilization.  Previously, the average school district needs in the formula could grow by 12 percent, and fast growing districts had no limits.  With LB959, each district’s target funding level is limited to five percent plus student growth in the formula.  Additionally, if a school district is shrinking, it allows the target funding level to decrease by up to two percent each year.  This means needs stabilization can increase or decrease within a range of 98 to 105 percent plus student growth.

 

Finally, the bill removes exceptions which previously allowed school districts and community colleges to unilaterally approve capital projects.  If LB959 is enacted, schools and community colleges will need to seek voter approval for qualified capital construction projects.

 

The taxpayers of Nebraska have made incredible financial commitments to our children and our schools.  Over the past 15 years, Nebraska’s student enrollment has grown about .33 percent annually for a total of five percent, while education spending in our state has grown at a compounding rate of 6.39 percent annually or 138 percent during the same timeframe.  LB959 does not remove any tools to maintain or grow this commitment, it simply limits the growth of spending annually, and provides for voter approval on additional spending. This proposal delivers structural property tax relief and still provides adequate resources to Nebraska schools to educate our students to be the leaders of tomorrow.

 

Some argue that not enough of Nebraska’s state budget is spent on education.  Forty-six percent of our current general fund budget is dedicated to K-12 and higher education.  Additionally, Nebraska ranks 21st in Elementary-Secondary Revenue (federal, state, and local sources) per pupil and 18th in Elementary-Secondary Spending per pupil overall.

 

Nebraskans, rural and urban, are demanding property tax relief, and I’ve prioritized it for this year.  I need you to help me get it done by contacting your state senator and voicing your support.  Lobbyists are paid by special interests to spend taxpayer money, and they are already trying to oppose property tax relief.  Please visit www.NebraskaLegislature.gov for information on who your senator is and how to contact them.

Governor Pete Ricketts

Governor Pete Ricketts

 

Senator Brasch Introduces LB 351


Despite weather conditions which led me to sadly leave home early and return to Lincoln on Saturday afternoon, we began business as usual on Monday. I arrived early to prepare for the big day of introducing LB 351 to the Education Committee. As mentioned last week, LB 351 increases income tax directed to local school districts from the current 2% to 20%. This helps schools receive important sources of local revenue and provides equitable distribution of the tax burden for education financing. During the hearing, questions were raised by three senators representing Lincoln and Omaha districts. These senators were concerned LB 351 would reduce funding urban schools and result in a mere tax shift. In response, I explained LB 351 returns more local dollars to schools and not less, especially to schools not receiving equalization aid from the state. Currently, property taxes are the main source of local revenues for our schools and, especially in our rural communities, the property tax is a disproportionate and burdensome mechanism for funding education. LB 351 is the sister bill of LB 350 which reduces agricultural and horticultural land valuations from 75% to 65%. LB 350 will have a public hearing on February 19.

 

Other bills I introduced have public hearings soon. LB 590 expands the authority of cities, villages, and counties to expand the use golf carts within their local jurisdiction and will be heard on February 10. LB 568 addresses a potential federal non-compliance issue regarding the administrative license revocation procedures of commercial driver’s license operators who have been arrested for driving while intoxicated and will be heard on February 17. LB 571 provides authority to the Tourism Commission to establish and promote tourism signage and will be heard on February 26. LB 340 would establish a definition for ‘conspicuous signage’ in regards to a person, entity, or employer in control of property prohibiting a concealed carry handgun permitholder from carrying in or on the place or premises and will be heard on March 20. One other bill, LB 569, is yet to receive a hearing date. Please know that you are invited to testify on bills of interest to help the Legislature in determining what is good for the State.

 

Finally, a special thank you to all those who visited our office this week. I met with Tom Black on behalf of retired teachers of the Nebraska State Education Association, members of the AFL/CIO, as well as members of the Burt County Extension’s Leading Locally Program, and James Moseman and his parents. We are proud of James as he received his district’s Voice of Democracy award.

 

Please contact me, my administrative aide, Katie Wattermann, or my legislative aide, Tom Venzor, with questions or thoughts at (402)471-2728 or by e-mail at lbrasch@leg.ne.gov. If you would like to follow the Legislature online visit http://www.netnebraska.org/basic-page/television/live-demand-state-government or watch live broadcasting on NET2.

 

Keeping the Good Life Growing in Nebraska,

Senator Lydia Brasch, District 16

Senator Lydia Brasch

Senator Lydia Brasch